» sjhoward.co.uk

  • Archive
  • Videos
  • Work
  • Tools
  • Freebies
  • Subscribe
  • Shop
  • Book
  • About
  • Filed at 20:22 on 11th May 2005.
    Filed by sjhoward at 20:22 on Wednesday, 11th May 2005 under Miscellaneous.

    As I’ve previously told you (weren’t you listening?!), I have a fairly unhealthy obsession with Su Doku. It’s becoming so much of a national obsession that it’s even featured on Richard and Judy. While I was washing up today, something in my slightly disturbed mind obviously connected this with my recent bordering-on-philosophical comments.

    Here’s what popped into my mind: I enjoy Su Doku. The part I enjoy most is the satisfaction of having completed the puzzle. The logical conclusion of this is that I would be happiest with a book of prefilled Su Dokus. But, of course, this misses the point: The completion is only enjoyable as a result of the prior frustration of being unable to solve said puzzle.

    So, if the majority of the world’s religions promise that we’ll live happily for eternity, wouldn’t the people in that place be incredibly bored and, ultimately depressed? If they’re all already as happy as they can possibly be, then they have nothing to strive for, nothing to work towards, and nothing to live for. What’s the point of living forever if you’ve nothing to acheive in that time?

    Surely a much better place to be would be hell, where you could always have aspirations of having a slightly less hellish time? You’d have something to work towards, each day would have a purpose, and eternal life would have much greater significance and meaning.

    Just a thought, straight from my head to yours.



    Interact with this post

    » Leave a comment or trackback about this post

    » Read others' comments, or subscribe to this post's RSS comments feed


    Your Comments and Responses

    Maximilian Goldenberg responds »

    You display a total failure of understanding the true nature of Hell.

    14th May 2005 | Permalink

    » This comment was received at 10:58 on 14 May 05


    The author, sjhoward responds, »

    The only way you could possibly know the true nature of Hell is if you are there. Otherwise you simply have an opposing belief. And if, indeed, you are in hell, then presumably this site is also there. Makes sense.

    14th May 2005 | Permalink

    » This comment was received at 11:30 on 14 May 05


    Maximilan Goldenberg responds »

    Nobody goes to Hell unwillingly.

    Maybe you should read the book

    “Whatever Happened to Hell” by John Blanchard

    http://www.evangelicalpress.org/books/Whatever%20happened%20to%20hell.htm

    http://www.gnpcb.org/product/0891078371

    Or are you too closed-minded to read such books?

    15th May 2005 | Permalink

    » This comment was received at 14:29 on 15 May 05


    The author, sjhoward responds, »

    Maybe you should read the book

    But which book? Why would I want to limit myself to the Christian interpretations of hell that you present?

    15th May 2005 | Permalink

    » This comment was received at 14:34 on 15 May 05


    Maximilan Goldenberg responds »

    Who said anything about limiting yourself to reading just one book on the subject, which you then dismiss out of hand.

    By your very response it is clear you are limiting yourself, by apparently refusing to even consider reading such a book because of its perspective.

    15th May 2005 | Permalink

    » This comment was received at 17:58 on 15 May 05


    The author, sjhoward responds, »

    I’ve read books by authors with many different perspectives. I would not dismiss reading the above book out of hand, I simply questioed whether it was wise to point to just a single book as a source of information.

    15th May 2005 | Permalink

    » This comment was received at 18:54 on 15 May 05


    Elsewhere on the site »

    This post has been referenced by another on this site:
    sjhoward.co.uk » The Sudoku craze rumbles on

    [...] The number puzzles Sudoku, first brought to Britain by The Times earlier this year, spawned something of a craze. A craze I covered in some detail. So it feels right to do some kind of six-months-on follow-up. [...]

    20th December 2005 | Permalink

    » This pingback was received at 22:50 on 20 December 05


    Write a new comment or response

    Commenting allows you to respond to what the author and other commenters have been said. Comments often appear on this page instantly, though sometimes take a little longer - especially if you are new to the site.

    Enter your comment in the text area below. You may use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> .

    Note: By submitting your comment, you confirm that it conforms to the site's Comment Policy.
    Gravatar: To show your face, sign up for Gravatar, and enter your email address above.






    Printed from http://sjhoward.co.uk/archive/2005/05/11/philosophy-and-su-doku
    (c) sjhoward.co.uk - full conditions can be viewed at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/uk/
    The content of this site is copyright protected by a Creative Commons License, with some rights reserved. All trademarks, images and logos remain the property of their respective owners. The accuracy of information on this site is in no way guaranteed. Opinions expressed are solely those of the author. No responsibility can be accepted for any loss or damage caused by reliance on the information provided by this site.